|

Comments
of Parents and Others Who've Seen the Movie
Movie
Reviews
Heh, Josie, PG 13 -- say it isn't so!!
What's up with that?!?
Some parents, who we applaud for their concern for their children
and for their diligence in supervising what their children are exposed
to, have written us to ask about the PG-13 rating that our Josie
and the Pussycats movie has been given. As a result of the rating,
they wonder whether the movie is appropriate for their younger children.
We were, frankly, a little surprised ourselves that the film got a
PG-13 rating. We thought it would end up being rated PG. In fact,
we worked very hard to keep "elements" out of the film that
would make it inappropriate for the younger members of our loyal comic
audience. (Rest assured we made a lot of "cuts".)
We would have liked to have appealed the rating - but you know what,
we don't control that issue. The studio does (and, honestly, there
is a belief in Hollywood that to attract an older audience, you cannot
be rated PG - a belief we do not share, but we were "outvoted").
But that's "behind the scenes" stuff, and I am sure you
are saying to yourself right now - "Michael, that's neither here
nor there, what I want to know right now is whether to let my child
see the movie."
Well, we think you should, for the reasons we've explained below.
We've set forth below the explanation provided by the ratings folks
regarding what makes one movie a PG movie and another a PG-13 movie.
You can read complete details of how the ratings system works at www.filmratings.com.
The reason that the ratings folks gave as to why our Josie and
the Pussycats movie should be rated PG-13 was the "language
and mild sensuality."
We think they are wrong. We believe our movie falls squarely within
the PG classification. Let me explain.
First, let me point out that the ratings folks acknowledge that there
is absolutely NO sex, nudity, or drug use in the Josie and the Pussycats
movie. Frankly, the most provocative thing that happens is a kiss
that is exchanged by
.
:
"Wait,
Michael -- we don't want to give away the story!"
Oops, you are right Josie, sorry -- but I think everyone gets the
idea - pretty mild stuff.
As for "language"
.
:
"Did we offend the ratings people because we made a "talkie?"
No, Melody, there is no rule against making a PG "talkie"
(LOL) - you can have words in your movie and still be rated PG.
This isn't a spinoff of the Rachel Welch "BC" movie - there
IS language in it, but the "language" is absolutely NOT
inappropriate for children under 13.
The absolutely worst use of language that
I can recall (and I've seen the movie a number of times) is a double
entendre use of the word "pussy" (we tried hard to keep
even this out - but we felt younger kids simply wouldn't even realize,
or be offended by, the "joke"). I honestly do not recall
anything inappropriate for young kids. After they have screened the
movie themselves and deemed it appropriate for younger audiences,
members of the production crew are bringing children as young as 6
.
As one of our executives said to me: "If I let my kids watch
Dawson Creek, I'll let them watch this - they are pretty much the
same."
As for "mild sensuality" - well, you've surely seen by now
the outfits that the girls wear (if you haven't, surf around our site
a little, we've got pictures of them plastered all over our website).
Their clothes are right out of the preteen/teen clothing catalogs
that come into all of our homes almost every week. And nobody (to
my knowledge) thinks those catalogs are inappropriate for children
under 13.
So we have ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA what the ratings folks meant when they
said there is "mild sensuality" in the film.
Admittedly, when your film stars three very pretty young ladies and
has a great supporting cast as well, it's sure to be perceived as
being a "hot" film. But that doesn't make it sensual (mildly
or otherwise). There is more sensuality in many Saturday morning television
shows than there is in our movie. Remember again there is only one
kiss (fully clothed, standing up, in front of an audience a la "Never
Been Kissed") in the entire
:
MICHAEL!!
Okay Val - I'll stop revealing the story.
In the end, what is right for each child must be decided on a case-by-case
basis by that child's parents.
We think the movie is appropriate for your children, since it is consistent
with our 60 year history of providing wholesome family entertainment.
For anyone who is still unsure though, maybe we can provide some "help."
We are asking parents who see the film to
e-mail us
with their comments. Check back here in coming
days and we will share those comments with you.
Please send your e-mail to:
Michael
Silberkleit, Chairman, Archie Comic Publications
REPRODUCED FROM THE FILMRATINGS.COM SITE
PG signifies that the film rated may
contain some material parents might not like to expose to their young
children - material that will clearly need to be examined or inquired
about before children are allowed to attend the film. Explicit sex
scenes and scenes of drug use are absent; nudity, if present, is seen
only briefly, horror and violence do not exceed moderate levels.
PG - 13Parents Strongly Cautioned. Some
material may be inappropriate for children under 13. This signifies
that the film rated may be inappropriate for pre-teens. Parents should
be especially careful about letting their younger children attend.
Rough or persistent violence is absent; sexually-oriented nudity is
generally absent; some scenes of drug use may be seen; one use of
the harsher sexually derived words may be heard.
Back to Central Riverdale
Back to Midvale
|